A North Carolina Legislator Thinks Free EV Charging Should Be Discouraged & Banned - CleanTechnica

2022-06-04 00:24:39 By : Ms. Sivvy Leung

Hi, what are you looking for?

NREL Creates Highest Efficiency 1-Sun Solar Cell

Toyota Residential Battery Supports Vehicle-To-Home Operation

US Department of the Interior Increasing Clean Energy Plants on Public Lands

Big Batteries for the South Pacific

At Long Last, Hawai’i Embraces Rooftop Solar Power

Wooden Towers To Help Cut The Cost Of Wind Turbines, Even More

OpenOA Software Improvements Illuminate Wind Plant Performance

Egypt Has Opportunity To Gain Green Infrastructure While Hydrogen Hype Persists

Algeria’s Hydrogen Export Hopes Will Be Crushed By Economics

Experts Forecast Wind Power Plant of the Future — Taller, Cheaper

DOE Launches $84 Million Enhanced Geothermal Energy Systems (Video)

Renewable Generation Surpassed Nuclear in the U.S. Electric Power Sector in 2021

Betting A Billion Dollars On Low-Carbon Grid Transformation Tech

Mexico’s Clean Energy Ambitions Realistic With These Renewable Energy Resources

Electrolyte Additive Offers Lithium Battery Performance Breakthrough

Turning High-Rise Buildings into Batteries

Toyota Residential Battery Supports Vehicle-To-Home Operation

Fiat Drops Non-EVs In UK, Long-Haul Electric Trucks, Electric Taxis For The Queen — EV News Today

Big Batteries for the South Pacific

Texan Tesla Powerwall Owners Can Help Change ERCOT’s Mind On VPPs

Gridspertise — Advanced Digital Solutions For A Smart, Resilient Grid

Betting A Billion Dollars On Low-Carbon Grid Transformation Tech

“Home of the Future” — Solar Power Home with Electric Ford F-150 Lightning Backup Power (Video)

Buzz Solutions Takes Out 50% Of Grid Inspection Image Effort & Duration

People Are Starting To Receive Starlink RV Terminals, & They’re Efficient

Speed, Bow Shape, & Ultrasonics, Electrification & More Will Reduce Marine Shipping Fuel Requirements

Automating The Secret Life Of Buildings: Interview With PassiveLogic CEO, Part 2

Converting From Fuel Oil To Heat Pumps Would Save The US 47% Of The Oil We Used To Import From Russia

Hyundai Built A Really Cool Efficient Camper Van

Autonomous Gold Coast Smart Shuttle

Electrolyte Additive Offers Lithium Battery Performance Breakthrough

Ford Adds 6200 Manufacturing Jobs, CEO Sees EV Price Wars Ahead

Rivian R1T Pickups Create A Big Buzz in Kenya

Toyota Residential Battery Supports Vehicle-To-Home Operation

How 3 Years With A Tesla Model 3 Almost Made Me Forget About The Mobility Revolution

Oupes 1800W Power Station — Solar Generator (CleanTechnica Review)

CleanTechnica Tested: FlexSolar 200 Watt Briefcase Solar Panel Kit

CleanTechnica Review: Fanttik X8 Air Compressor

CleanTechnica Review: Hiboy VE1 Pro Electric Scooter

Norway Continues To Grow EV Share In May

Sweden’s Plugin EV Share Keeps Growing, Up 22% YoY

Stellantis Wins #1 & #2 in Europe — Plugin Vehicle Sales Report

Dutch BEV Sales Up 98%, Tailpipe Vehicles Down 19% In April 2022

Tesla FSD Training — Garbage In, Garbage Out

How 3 Years With A Tesla Model 3 Almost Made Me Forget About The Mobility Revolution

Oupes 1800W Power Station — Solar Generator (CleanTechnica Review)

CleanTechnica Tested: FlexSolar 200 Watt Briefcase Solar Panel Kit

CleanTechnica Review: Fanttik X8 Air Compressor

CleanTechnica Review: Hiboy VE1 Pro Electric Scooter

Tesla Q4 Shareholder Conference Call — Watch & Listen Here

Volkswagen Group — In-Depth Conference Call Highlights Company’s Focus On Transition

Bill McKibben On Unions, Tesla, & Elon Musk — CleanTechnica Interview

How To Watch & Listen To Tesla Q3 Earnings Call — Most Useful Livestream

Tesla Sales & Future of Tesla Discussion with Ride the Lightning, Starman, & EVANNEX

TANSTAAFL (There Ain’t No Such Thing As A Free Lunch) is an established economic principle. In short, if a business or other organization is giving you something, you’ll probably end up paying for it sooner or later. It dates back to the once common practice of saloons offering people free lunch if they’d purchase at least one drink, but what the bar didn’t tell you was that the lunch was high in salt and other ingredients to make you thirsty. So, the lunch was free, but you end up paying for it as part of the price of the extra beer.

Even if you don’t pay for the free thing, somebody somewhere does. It may be other customers of the business today, and it may be you covering the cost another day, but someone covers it. Or, it could become what economists call an externality, or a cost that society ends up paying. Either way, someone pays.

It’s this sound principle that drives a recent bill in North Carolina, H1049. It aims to force businesses to disclose what the average cost is for each customer if the business offers free EV charging:

“Any person who is engaged in a business where electric vehicle charging stations are provided for use by the public at no charge shall ensure that each customer of the business, without regard to whether the customer uses the charging stations, is informed of, on the receipt for purchases, the percentage of the amount of the customer’s total purchase price that is a result of the business providing electric vehicle charging stations at no charge.”

The idea here is obviously to discourage businesses from offering free EV charging. When their customers who don’t own an EV see that it costs them something for those “rich people” to charge their cars, they’ll be mad about it and complain to the business. So, the business will have to either start charging for charging or they’ll have to shut the stations down.

What the bill doesn’t make clear is how they’d expect a business to calculate this. Unless a business can determine exactly how much business came in as a result of the free charging, it’s impossible for them to actually calculate the cost of free charging. It could be that they’re actually money ahead (which is likely), and that the cost to each customer is on average below zero, as the EV drivers are fully covering the cost. I’m sure that if this bill were to pass, there would be arguments over points like this in court, because it’s just not a very well thought out bill.

Even if there was a bulletproof way to make businesses lose face over this, it wouldn’t be hard for the business to bypass it by charging a penny annually for access to the chargers, and they could do it by an honor system or by putting a “tip jar” on the charging station for people to deposit their penny. Because it’s not longer technically free, the business would no longer have to worry about such a law.

While the bill doesn’t outright prohibit installing chargers on NCDOT property, or otherwise installed by NCDOT, it would make it basically impossible. Regardless of whether users are charged for the station, any location that has an EV charger also has to give away free gas and diesel fuel.

“Except as provided in G.S. 136-18.02, the Department of Transportation shall not use public funds to provide electric vehicle charging stations on property owned or leased by the State or to fund or install electric vehicle charging stations on property owned or leased by a person or entity unless the Department or the person or entity provides gasoline and diesel fuel for motor vehicles through a pump to the public at no charge.”

This puts all EV charging at a disadvantage, with free fuel for drivers of ICE cars even if EV drivers are paying for electricity. The real goal is obviously to get NCDOT to not install charging stations at all in places like rest areas.

Anyone who’s taken any trips in an EV knows that it’s often a local government that hosts a charging station. The bill’s author also wants to target these government stations and keep them from offering free charging. Because local governments don’t have as many economic rights as businesses, they can get away with a lot more to make life hard in this case.

How? By prohibiting any public funds from going toward the installation of any charging station station where gasoline and diesel is not given away for free (like the NCDOT provision above):

“A county shall not use public funds to provide electric vehicle charging stations on property owned or leased by the county or to fund or install electric vehicle charging stations on property owned or leased by a person or entity unless the county or the person or entity provides gasoline or diesel fuel for motor vehicles through a pump to the public at no charge.”

There’s also a similar provision for cities, and it’s worded the same as the text above for counties.

Finally, this bill would appropriate $50,000 of state money for the removal of charging stations on any public property where gas and diesel isn’t free. This would obviously be a big waste of taxpayer funds.

The truth is, governments give the public services all the time. Police and fire services are the obvious one. Parks, recreation facilities, and other things are often run by cities. Even roads, which can be very expensive to maintain come from municipal funds and drivers aren’t charged a toll every time they leave a driveway. To call out EV charging like this, and liken it to providing free gas or diesel makes little sense.

The reality is that this bill is designed to garner support from gullible people who think EV charging is expensive and doesn’t have larger benefits than costs, and then kneecap electric vehicles as much as possible.

Fortunately, this is just a bill, and hasn’t become a law. If you live in North Carolina, or if you frequently travel there, go to the bill’s page and let NC legislators know what you think of it. Let them know you can see through the illusion here. Hopefully we can stop them from playing these stupid games.

Featured image: a 2011 Nissan LEAF at a free municipal charging station. Image by Jennifer Sensiba.

Jennifer Sensiba is a long time efficient vehicle enthusiast, writer, and photographer. She grew up around a transmission shop, and has been experimenting with vehicle efficiency since she was 16 and drove a Pontiac Fiero. She likes to explore the Southwest US with her partner, kids, and animals. Follow her on Twitter for her latest articles and other random things: https://twitter.com/JenniferSensiba

#1 most loved electric vehicle, solar energy, and battery news & analysis site in the world.   Support our work today!

Advertise with CleanTechnica to get your company in front of millions of monthly readers.

What kind of progress is your city making toward all-electric fleets? It is asking critical questions regarding its infrastructure needs, climate challenges, and procurement...

VinFast is coming to North Carolina and promising thousands of new jobs.

As of the end of 2021, 31 states and the District of Columbia had renewable portfolio standards (RPS) or clean energy standards (CES). These polices...

The firm FlexGen is set to make its mark its mark on the US energy storage industry, with an assist from North Carolina's powerful...

Copyright © 2021 CleanTechnica. The content produced by this site is for entertainment purposes only. Opinions and comments published on this site may not be sanctioned by and do not necessarily represent the views of CleanTechnica, its owners, sponsors, affiliates, or subsidiaries.